DuckDB vs. Snowflake vs. Databricks

A comprehensive comparison for modern data processing

The exponential growth of data in recent years has revolutionized the way businesses operate and make decisions. From small start-ups to large enterprises, organizations across industries are leveraging data to gain competitive advantages, optimize operations, and drive innovation. However, with this data surge comes the challenge of efficiently storing, processing, and retrieving vast amounts of information.

While traditional solutions like SQLite and MySQL have their place, modern data platforms like DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks are reshaping the landscape of data processing.

• DuckDB🪶💻: DuckDB has carved out a niche as a lightweight, in-process analytical database, ideal for quick analyses of local datasets using SQL queries.
• Snowflake☁️📈: Snowflake has revolutionized the data warehousing space with its cloud-native, scalable architecture, offering comprehensive data storage, processing, and AI integration capabilities.
• Databricks🌐⚙️🔥: Databricks offers a unified platform for big data processing and machine learning, building on the power of Apache Spark, and providing a complete ecosystem for data storage, processing, and advanced analytics.

As we delve into the comparison of these data analytics platforms, it’s important to note that each has its strengths and is designed with specific use cases in mind. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting the right tool for your data processing needs.

Core architecture

To truly appreciate the capabilities and limitations of DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks, we need to understand their underlying architectures.

DuckDB: The in-process analytical powerhouse

DuckDB stands out with its unique architecture as an embeddable SQL OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) database management system. Unlike traditional client-server database systems, DuckDB runs entirely within the process of the host application.

Key architectural features of DuckDB include:

1. Self-hosted execution: DuckDB operates within the same process as the host application or user environment, eliminating network overhead and enabling extremely fast query execution.
   
2. Columnar storage: Data is stored in a column-oriented format, which is optimized for analytical queries that often involve scanning large portions of a few columns. DuckDB’s architecture shares some similarities with SQLite, but it’s optimized for analytical workloads, often outperforming SQLite in OLAP scenarios.
   
3. Vectorized query execution: DuckDB processes data in small batches (typically 1024 values at a time), allowing for efficient use of CPU caches and SIMD instructions. While this approach optimizes performance for local, single-node operations, it could become a bottleneck for high-volume scenarios. MotherDuck commercializes DuckDB and can handle spilling disks.
4. Adaptive compression: The system automatically selects the most appropriate compression scheme for each column, balancing between storage efficiency and query performance.

Snowflake: Cloud-native data platform

Snowflake takes a radically different approach with its cloud-native, fully managed data warehouse architecture. Its unique design separates compute and storage, allowing for independent scaling of these resources.

Key components of Snowflake’s architecture include:

1. Multi-cluster, shared data resources: Snowflake uses multiple compute clusters that can all access the same centralized data storage, enabling concurrent queries without data duplication.
2. Cloud storage with proprietary layer: While data is stored in cloud services (e.g., Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, or Google Cloud Storage), Snowflake implements a proprietary layer that optimizes data access and management. This enables the platform to provide a unified interface across cloud providers, implement advanced data management features (e.g. time travel), and optimize data format and compression for workloads.
3. Virtual warehouses: Compute resources are organized into “virtual warehouses” that can be independently scaled up or down based on workload demands.
4. Micro-partitions and data clustering: Data is automatically organized into micro-partitions and clustered for optimal query performance.
5. Snowpark: Extending Snowflake beyond SQL data processing with native unstructured data processing capabilities.  

Snowflake’s architecture is focused on providing a fully managed data cloud, with strong emphasis on separating storage and compute for optimal performance and cost management in cloud environments.

Databricks: Unified data intelligence platform

Databricks offers a comprehensive platform that combines the power of Apache Spark with additional proprietary technologies to create a unified environment for data engineering, analytics, and machine learning.

Key aspects of Databricks’ architecture include:

1. Apache Spark: While Snowflake also supports Spark jobs, Databricks has chosen to deeply integrate and optimize Spark as its core engine.
2. Delta Lake & Apache Iceberg: Databricks introduced Delta Lake, an open-source storage layer that brings ACID transactions and increased reliability to data lakes. 
3. Support for multiple use cases: Databricks is composed of a few main products, such as Workflows/Jobs for ETL pipelines, SQL Warehouses, All-Purpose Compute for ad-hoc workloads, and notebooks for ad-hoc data science work (with support for Python, PySpark, and SQL).
4. MLflow integration: Built-in support for MLflow enables streamlined machine learning workflows, from experimentation to deployment.

Databricks implements a lakehouse approach, combining the best features of data warehouses and data lakes. The data cloud was actually the first to come up with this hybrid concept. This architecture allows for more flexible data storage and processing options, particularly suited for organizations with diverse data types and advanced analytical needs.

Use Cases

Understanding the typical use cases for each platform is crucial in determining which solution aligns best with your organization’s needs. Let’s explore the scenarios where DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks excel.

DuckDB use cases

DuckDB shines in scenarios that require quick, efficient analysis of small to medium-sized datasets. Some of the DuckDB use cases are:

1. Data science and exploratory data analysis: Data scientists and analysts can leverage DuckDB for rapid prototyping and exploration of datasets without the need for a complex setup.
2. Embedded analytics: Applications that require built-in analytical capabilities can embed DuckDB to provide fast query performance without external dependencies.
3. Local data processing: For tasks involving local files or moderately sized datasets, DuckDB offers a lightweight alternative to setting up a full database server.
4. ETL processes: DuckDB can efficiently handle extract, transform, and load (ETL) operations on local data, making it useful for data preparation tasks.

The Python-based open-source data analysis project, pandas, is another popular tool for data manipulation. DuckDB stands out as an attractive alternative when dealing with datasets that exceed in-memory limits. While pandas is well-suited for small in-memory datasets, DuckDB scales more effectively, allowing you to work with larger datasets without performance degradation due to memory constraints.

Snowflake use cases 

Snowflake’s cloud-native architecture is designed to handle large-scale, enterprise-level data pipelines. It excels in:

1. Centralized data repository: Organizations can use Snowflake as a single source of truth for their data, accessible to multiple teams and applications.
2. Business intelligence and reporting: Snowflake’s performance and scalability make it ideal for powering BI tools and generating complex reports on large datasets.
3. Data sharing and data marketplaces: Snowflake’s unique data sharing capabilities allow organizations to easily share and monetize their data.
4. AI & ML: Snowflake’s architecture supports AI/ML workflows, with integrations with AI platforms, making it a great option for organizations leveraging AI for predictive analytics, real-time decision-making, and model training at scale. While the platform is getting better at supporting AI and machine learning workflows, this is a relatively new capability for Snowflake compared to Databricks. 

Databricks use cases

Databricks offers a comprehensive platform that caters to a wide range of big data and machine learning use cases: 

1. Unified governance: Centrally manage access to your data, the pipelines that build tables, and the models built from that data using Unity Catalog and Workspaces.
2. Advanced analytics and machine learning: Databricks provides an integrated environment for developing and deploying machine learning models at scale.
3. Real-time data processing: With its Spark foundation, Databricks excels at processing streaming data for real-time analytics and applications.
4. Large-scale ETL and data engineering: For complex data transformation and integration tasks involving massive datasets, Databricks offers powerful tools and optimizations.

Related posts:

We also put together a comprehensive guide on Databricks vs. Snowflake earlier this year. Check it out for an even more focused head-to-head comparison of these two data clouds.

Performance and scalability

As data volumes and requirements grow, the performance and scalability of a data processing platform become critical factors. Let’s examine how DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks handle increasing workloads and compare their capabilities in this area.

DuckDB: 

DuckDB’s in-process architecture gives it a significant performance advantage for certain types of workloads, particularly when dealing with local, moderately sized datasets.

Performance strengths:

• Extremely fast query execution for in-memory datasets
• Efficient use of CPU caches and vectorized processing
• Low latency due to lack of client-server communication

Scalability limitations:

• Limited by the resources of a single node. (MotherDuck solves this in its commercial offering).
• Not designed for distributed computing or very large datasets
• Performance may degrade as data size approaches or exceeds available RAM

Snowflake: 

Snowflake’s cloud-native architecture is designed for elastic scalability, allowing it to handle growing workloads with ease.

Performance strengths:

• Automatic query optimization and caching
• Independent scaling of compute and storage resources
• Concurrent queries across multiple virtual warehouses

Scalability features:

• Virtually unlimited storage capacity
• Ability to scale compute resources up or down instantly
• Multi-cluster architecture for high concurrency

Databricks: 

Databricks leverages the distributed computing capabilities of Apache Spark, enhanced with proprietary optimizations, to deliver high performance and scalability for big data workloads.

Performance strengths:

• Distributed processing for handling massive datasets
• Strong support for Python users for applications in ETL, ML, and AI. 
• Optimized for both batch and streaming data processing

Scalability features:

• Elastic scaling of compute resources
• Support for multi-node clusters
• Ability to handle petabyte-scale datasets

To further optimize Databricks’ performance and scalability, Sync’s Health Check provides instant insights into how your organization utilizes the platform. It pinpoints inefficiencies and surfaces opportunities to enhance performance, resource allocation, and cost efficiency. 

Ease of use and integration

The usability and integration capabilities of a data processing platform can significantly impact its adoption and effectiveness within an organization. Let’s explore how DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks compare in terms of ease of use and their ability to integrate with existing tools and workflows.

DuckDB: Simplicity and minimal setup

DuckDB stands out for its simplicity and ease of use, particularly for users familiar with SQL.

Ease of use:

• Minimal setup required – can be used as a Python library or standalone executable
• Familiar SQL interface for querying and data manipulation
• Seamless integration with data science tools like pandas and Arrow

Integration capabilities:

• Can directly query Parquet files and other data formats
• Easy to embed in applications or use in data science workflows
• Supports integration with various programming languages (Python, R, Java, etc.). DuckDB’s versatility extends to cloud environments, with growing support for integration with AWS services, including the ability to run in AWS Lambda functions.

DuckDB’s simplicity makes it an excellent choice for data scientists who need quick access to SQL capabilities without the overhead of setting up a database server. Its ability to work directly with files and integrate with popular data science tools enhances its utility in analytical workflows.

Snowflake: Cloud-native management and seamless scaling

Snowflake offers a user-friendly interface combined with powerful management features, aiming to simplify data warehousing operations.

Ease of use:

• Web-based UI for query execution, data loading, and management tasks
• Automatic optimization and indexing of data
• Built-in data sharing and collaboration features

Integration capabilities:

• Wide range of connectors for BI tools and data integration platforms
• Support for various programming languages and frameworks
• Native integrations with cloud services and data orchestration tools

Databricks: Comprehensive platform with advanced capabilities

Databricks offers a unified platform that combines ease of use with advanced features for data engineering, analytics, and machine learning.

Ease of use:

• Collaborative notebooks for interactive data exploration and analysis
• Autoscaling capabilities and Serverless Compute, however, compute management for server offerings remains a complex task.
• Integrated workflows for data engineering and machine learning tasks

Integration capabilities:

• Native integration with major cloud providers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud)
• Support for a wide range of data sources and formats
• Extensive ecosystem of tools and libraries for data science and ML

The choice between these platforms often depends on the technical expertise of your team, the complexity of your data workloads, and the level of integration required with existing systems and tools.

Related posts:

Read more on Apache Spark scaling (AWS EMR and Databricks) and the top three trends we discovered.

Cost and pricing models: Balancing performance and budget

Understanding the cost structures and pricing models of DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks is crucial for making an informed decision that aligns with your organization’s budget and data processing needs. Let’s break down the pricing approaches of each platform and consider their cost-effectiveness for different scenarios.

DuckDB: Open-source and free

DuckDB stands out in this comparison because it’s open-source and free, meaning there’s no formal cost structure.

Pricing model:

• Completely free and open-source
• No licensing fees or usage costs

Cost considerations:

While the software itself is free, there may be indirect costs associated with:

• Development and maintenance of applications using DuckDB
• Hardware resources for running DuckDB (e.g., powerful local machines for larger datasets)
• Your engineers’ time due to lack of support, or the price of a support plan

Snowflake: Pay-as-you-go cloud economics

Snowflake employs a consumption-based pricing model, aligning costs with actual usage.

Pricing model:

• Separate charges for compute and storage
• Compute billed per second of usage, with different rates for various virtual warehouse sizes
• Storage charged based on the amount of data stored and the duration of storage

Cost considerations:

• The simplicity of serverless
• Being that this is a serverless offering, you do not have control of the configuration (clusters, workers, nodes, etc.). 
• While simplifying management, this can lead to over-provisioning and higher costs
• Snowflake is building out many new cost management tools to help users optimize costs

Databricks: Unified analytics platform pricing

Pricing for running your jobs on Databricks is also usage based. However, the platform has a more complex pricing structure, for some of its features (e.g. SQL warehouse). To fully understand your costs, check out our extensive post on Databricks pricing and how to optimize your expenses.

Pricing model:

• Charges based on Databricks Units (DBUs) consumed, which vary by compute instance type
• Workspace-based pricing with different tiers (Standard, Premium, Enterprise) for some features

Cost considerations:

• Offers more control over computing resources than Snowflake by offering both server and serverless products. 
• Users can manually select and configure resources, but this process can be complex and time-consuming
• Photon, Graviton and Spot instances can lead to cost savings when used correctly
• Autoscaling can help manage costs for some jobs, but has been found to be significantly less effective than Gradient. 
• Lakehouse architecture potentially reduces overall data management costs

Comparative analysis

When evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these platforms:

• DuckDB is unbeatable for zero direct costs, making it ideal for small-scale or budget-constrained projects. However, it’s limited to local processing and doesn’t offer built-in scalability or advanced AI features. And with no support, implementing teams need to be hands-on and willing to invest engineering hours in customizing the project to their needs. Check out MotherDuck, the company commercializing DubckDB, for more advanced enterprise features.
• Snowflake provides a good balance of performance and cost for organizations transitioning to cloud-based data warehousing, especially those with variable workloads. It supports larger-scale operations and offers some AI capabilities through integrations, justifying its higher cost for enterprises requiring these features.
• Databricks can offer value for organizations that fully utilize its unified platform, potentially reducing costs associated with managing multiple separate tools. Its strength lies in supporting very large-scale data processing and advanced AI/ML workflows, making it suitable for organizations with complex, data-intensive needs.

It’s crucial to consider not just the direct costs, but also the potential savings in development time, management overhead, and the ability to derive value from data quickly. A platform that appears more expensive upfront may prove cost-effective if it significantly enhances productivity or enables new revenue-generating insights.

Key takeaways: Choosing the right platform for data analysis

When selecting between DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks, consider these key factors:

1. Data scale:
   • DuckDB: Small to medium, local datasets
   • Snowflake: Large-scale data warehousing
   • Databricks: Big data and diverse workloads
2. Use case:
   • DuckDB: SQL queries, data warehousing with support for rapid prototyping, embedded analytics
   • Snowflake: Enterprise data warehousing, data pipeline processing with support for ML jobs, BI reporting,
   • Databricks: Data lakehouse, advanced data processing with support for ML & AI apps
3. Ease of use:
   • DuckDB: Simplest setup, minimal management
   • Snowflake: User-friendly interface, managed service
   • Databricks: Comprehensive but more complex
4. Cost structure:
   • DuckDB: Free, open-source
   • Snowflake: Pay-as-you-go
   • Databricks: DBU consumption
5. Scalability:
   • DuckDB: Limited to single-machine resources
   • Snowflake: Elastic cloud scalability
   • Databricks: Distributed computing, extensive scaling

Choose based on your use case data volume, analytical complexity, team expertise, budget, and growth projections. Remember, these platforms can be complementary, often used in combination to address diverse data processing needs.

Comparison table

Feature	DuckDB	Snowflake	Databricks
Architecture	🖥️ In-process, columnar	☁️ Cloud-native, separate storage & compute	🔗 Unified analytics platform
Best for	🔍 Local analytics, data science	🏢 Enterprise data warehousing, AI/ML integration	📊 Big data processing, ML/AI
Data scale	📊 Small to medium	🌐 Large	🚀 Very large (Big Data)
Setup complexity	🔧 Minimal	⚙️ Moderate	🏗️ High
Control over costs	N/A	🔧Minimal	⚙️Moderate, but it’s difficult to tune clusters
Scalability	🖥️ Limited (single machine)	🌐 Highly scalable (cloud)	⚡ Highly scalable (distributed)
Cost	💸 Free, open-source	💳 Pay-as-you-go	📈 Consumption-based
Language support	🔤 SQL, Python, R, Java	🖥️ SQL (primary). Python, Java, and Scala support via Snowpark	💻 SQL, Python, R, Scala, Java
Unique strength	⚡ Simplicity & speed for local data	🔄 Easy scaling & data sharing	🛠️ Unified platform for diverse workloads

This table provides a quick overview of the key characteristics of each platform, allowing for easy comparison across important features.

Conclusion

DuckDB, Snowflake, and Databricks each offer unique approaches to modern data processing challenges. The rapid evolution of these platforms reflects the growing complexity and scale of data operations in today’s business landscape. 

While choosing the right platform is crucial, it’s equally important to foster a data-driven culture within your organization. Invest in training, encourage experimentation, and be prepared to adapt as your needs change and new technologies emerge. 

Whether you’re choosing between DuckDB, Databricks, and Snowflake for cloud-based analytics, or considering DuckDB as an alternative to pandas for local data processing, understanding these platforms’ strengths is key to making the right decision for your data strategy. By making informed decisions and leveraging the strengths of these modern data processing platforms, you can position your organization to thrive in an increasingly data-centric world.

---

Try Gradient

As compute costs (and engineering hours) increase, an automated cluster management solution is practically mandatory. Our product, Gradient, helps data engineers and platform managers achieve optimal cost and runtime performance without manual tuning – resulting in:

• Cost savings of up to 50%
• Consistently met SLAs
• 10 engineering hours per engineer reclaimed a week

Book a demo to learn more